Home | Back
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4044
committer: Balasubramanian Kandasamy <balasubramanian.kandasamy@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1.72-release
timestamp: Mon 2013-09-09 20:07:12 +0200
message:
   Reverted the changes to spec file to ignore mysqld_safe.pid file, updated the logic to get the correct count of PID files
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4043
committer: Hery Ramilison <hery.ramilison@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1.72-release
timestamp: Mon 2013-09-09 18:58:08 +0200
message:
  Committing patch from venkata.sidagam@oracle.com for Bug#16776528
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4042
committer: Hery Ramilison <hery.ramilison@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1.72-release
timestamp: Tue 2013-09-03 18:37:46 +0200
message:
  Fixing sles11 build that /usr/lib/mysql/plugin is not owned by a package
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4041
committer: Balasubramanian Kandasamy <balasubramanian.kandasamy@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1.72-release
timestamp: Fri 2013-08-30 17:14:46 +0200
message:
  Fix to ignore mysqld_safe.pid
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4040
committer: Balasubramanian Kandasamy <balasubramanian.kandasamy@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1.72-release
timestamp: Thu 2013-08-29 14:42:55 +0200
message:
  Fix for Bug#17377159, ignore mysqld_safe.pid file created by mysqld_safe script
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4039
tags: clone-5.1.72-build
committer: Neeraj Bisht <neeraj.x.bisht@oracle.com>
branch nick: 5.1
timestamp: Fri 2013-08-23 16:54:25 +0530
message:
  Bug#17029399 - CRASH IN ITEM_REF::FIX_FIELDS WITH TRIGGER ERRORS
  
  Problem:-
  In a Procedure, when we are comparing value of select query
  with IN clause and they both have different collation, cause
  error on first time execution and assert second time.
  procedure will have query like
  set @x = ((select a from t1) in (select d from t2));<---proc1
                sel1                   sel2
  
  Analysis:-
  When we execute this proc1(first time)
  While resolving the fields of user variable, we will call
  Item_in_subselect::fix_fields while will resolve sel2. There
  in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer, we evaluate the
  left expression(sel1) and store it in Item_cache_* object
  (to avoid re-evaluating it many times during subquery execution)
  by making Item_in_optimizer class.
  While evaluating left expression we will prepare sel1.
  After that, we will put a new condition in sel2  
  in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer() which will compare
  t2.d and sel1(which is cached in Item_in_optimizer).
  
  Later while checking the collation in agg_item_collations()
  we get error and we cleanup the item. While cleaning up we cleaned
  the cached value in Item_in_optimizer object.
  
  When we execute the procedure second time, we have condition for
  sel2 and while setup_cond(), we can't able to find reference item
  as it is cleanup while item cleanup.So it assert.
  
  
  Solution:-
  We should not cleanup the cached value for Item_in_optimizer object,
  if we have put the condition to subselect.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4038 [merge]
committer: Marko M?kel? <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1-current
timestamp: Wed 2013-08-21 11:54:09 +0300
message:
  Merge working copy to mysql-5.1.
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 4036.1.2 [merge]
    committer: Marko M?kel? <marko.makela@oracle.com>
    branch nick: mysql-5.1
    timestamp: Wed 2013-08-21 10:03:31 +0300
    message:
      Merge mysql-5.1 to working copy.
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 4036.1.1
    committer: Marko M?kel? <marko.makela@oracle.com>
    branch nick: mysql-5.1
    timestamp: Wed 2013-08-21 08:22:05 +0300
    message:
      Bug#12560151 61132: infinite loop in buf_page_get_gen() when handling
      compressed pages
      
      After loading a compressed-only page in buf_page_get_gen() we allocate a new
      block for decompression. The problem is that the compressed page is neither
      buffer-fixed nor I/O-fixed by the time we call buf_LRU_get_free_block(),
      so it may end up being evicted and returned back as a new block.
      
      buf_page_get_gen(): Temporarily buffer-fix the compressed-only block
      while allocating memory for an uncompressed page frame.
      This should prevent this form of the infinite loop, which is more likely
      with a small innodb_buffer_pool_size.
      
      rb#2511 approved by Jimmy Yang, Sunny Bains
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4037
committer: Praveenkumar Hulakund <praveenkumar.hulakund@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql_5_1
timestamp: Wed 2013-08-21 10:39:40 +0530
message:
  Bug#11765252 - READ OF FREED MEMORY WHEN "USE DB" AND
                 "SHOW PROCESSLIST"
  
  Analysis:
  ----------
  The problem here is, if one connection changes its
  default db and at the same time another connection executes
  "SHOW PROCESSLIST", when it wants to read db of the another
  connection then there is a chance of accessing the invalid
  memory.
  
  The db name stored in THD is not guarded while changing user
  DB and while reading the user DB in "SHOW PROCESSLIST".
  So, if THD.db is freed by thd "owner" thread and if another
  thread executing "SHOW PROCESSLIST" statement tries to read
  and copy THD.db at the same time then we may endup in the issue
  reported here.
  
  Fix:
  ----------
  Used mutex "LOCK_thd_data" to guard THD.db while freeing it
  and while copying it to processlist.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4036
committer: Marko M?kel? <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1
timestamp: Fri 2013-08-16 15:45:41 +0300
message:
  Bug#17312846 CHECK TABLE ASSERTION FAILURE
  DICT_TABLE_GET_FORMAT(CLUST_INDEX->TABLE) >= 1
  
  The function row_sel_sec_rec_is_for_clust_rec() was incorrectly
  preparing to compare a NULL column prefix in a secondary index with a
  non-NULL column in a clustered index.
  
  This can trigger an assertion failure in 5.1 plugin and later. In the
  built-in InnoDB of MySQL 5.1 and earlier, we would apparently only do
  some extra work, by trimming the clustered index field for the
  comparison.
  
  The code might actually have worked properly apart from this debug
  assertion failure. It is merely doing some extra work in fetching a
  BLOB column, and then comparing it to NULL (which would return the
  same result, no matter what the BLOB contents is).
  
  While the test case involves CHECK TABLE, this could theoretically
  occur during any read that uses a secondary index on a column prefix
  of a column that can be NULL.
  
  rb#3101 approved by Mattias Jonsson
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4035
committer: Marko M?kel? <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1
timestamp: Thu 2013-08-15 15:23:23 +0300
message:
  Bug#17302896 DOUBLE PURGE ON ROLLBACK OF UPDATING A DELETE-MARKED RECORD
  
  There was a race condition in the rollback of TRX_UNDO_UPD_DEL_REC.
  
  Once row_undo_mod_clust() has rolled back the changes by the rolling-back
  transaction, it attempts to purge the delete-marked record, if possible, in a
  separate mini-transaction.
  
  However, row_undo_mod_remove_clust_low() fails to check if the DB_TRX_ID of
  the record that it found after repositioning the cursor, is still the same.
  If it is not, it means that the record was purged and another record was
  inserted in its place.
  
  So, the rollback would have performed an incorrect purge, breaking the
  locking rules and causing corruption.
  
  The problem was found by creating a table that contains a unique
  secondary index and a primary key, and two threads running REPLACE
  with only one value for the unique column, so that the uniqueness
  constraint would be violated all the time, leading to statement
  rollback.
  
  This bug exists in all InnoDB versions (I checked MySQL 3.23.53).
  It has become easier to repeat in 5.5 and 5.6 thanks to scalability
  improvements and a dedicated purge thread.
  
  rb#3085 approved by Jimmy Yang
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4034
committer: Marko M?kel? <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1
timestamp: Wed 2013-08-14 09:43:21 +0300
message:
  Bug#16971045 ASSERTION FAILURES ON ROLLBACK OF AN INSERT AFTER A
  FAILED BLOB WRITE
  
  btr_store_big_rec_extern_fields(): Relax a debug assertion so that
  some BLOB pointers may remain zero if an error occurs.
  
  btr_free_externally_stored_field(), row_undo_ins(): Allow the BLOB
  pointer to be zero on any rollback.
  
  rb#3059 approved by Jimmy Yang, Kevin Lewis
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4033
committer: Anirudh Mangipudi <anirudh.mangipudi@oracle.com>
branch nick: final-5.1
timestamp: Mon 2013-08-12 21:54:50 +0530
message:
  Bug #16776528 RACE CONDITION CAN CAUSE MYSQLD TO REMOVE SOCKET FILE ERRANTLY
  Problem Description:
  A mysqld_safe instance is started. An InnoDB crash recovery begins which takes
  few seconds to complete. During this crash recovery process happening, another
  mysqld_safe instance is started with the same server startup parameters. Since
  the mysqld's pid file is absent during the crash recovery process the second
  instance assumes there is no other process and tries to acquire a lock on the
  ibdata files in the datadir.  But this step fails and the 2nd instance keeps
  retrying 100 times each with a delay of 1 second. Now after the 100 attempts,
  the server goes down, but while going down it hits the mysqld_safe script's
  cleanup section and without any check it blindly deletes the socket and pid
  files. Since no lock is placed on the socket file, it gets deleted.
  
  Solution:
  We create a mysqld_safe.pid file in the datadir, which protects the presence
  server instance resources by storing the mysqld_safe's process id in it. We
  place a check if the mysqld_safe.pid file is existing in the datadir. If yes
  then we check if the pid it contains is an active pid or not. If yes again,
  then the scripts logs an error saying "A mysqld_safe instance is already
  running". Otherwise it will log the present mysqld_safe's pid into the
  mysqld_safe.pid file.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4032
committer: Joao Gramacho <joao.gramacho@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1
timestamp: Wed 2013-07-31 17:54:40 +0100
message:
  Bug#16997513 MY_STRTOLL10 ACCEPTING OVERFLOWED UNSIGNED LONG LONG VALUES AS NORMAL ONES
  
  Problem:
  =======
  It was detected an incorrect behavior of my_strtoll10 function when
  converting strings with numbers in the following format:
  "184467440XXXXXXXXXYY"
  
  Where XXXXXXXXX > 737095516 and YY <= 15
  
  Samples of problematic numbers:
  "18446744073709551915"
  "18446744073709552001"
  
  Instead of returning the larger unsigned long long value and setting overflow
  in the returned error code, my_strtoll10 function returns the lower 64-bits
  of the evaluated number and did not set overflow in the returned error code.
  
  Analysis:
  ========
  Once trying to fix bug 16820156, I've found this bug in the overflow check of
  my_strtoll10 function.
  
  This function, once receiving a string with an integer number larger than
  18446744073709551615 (the larger unsigned long long number) should return the
  larger unsigned long long number and set overflow in the returned error code.
  
  Because of a wrong overflow evaluation, the function didn't catch the
  overflow cases where (i == cutoff) && (j > cutoff2) && (k <= cutoff3). When
  the overflow evaluation fails, the function return the lower 64-bits of the
  evaluated number and do not set overflow in the returned error code.
  
  Fix:
  ===
  Corrected the overflow evaluation in my_strtoll10.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4031
committer: prabakaran thirumalai <prabakaran.thirumalai@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1-try
timestamp: Tue 2013-07-30 09:44:11 +0530
message:
  Bug#17083851    BACKPORT BUG#11765744 TO 5.1, 5.5 AND 5.6
  
  Description:
  Original fix Bug#11765744 changed mutex to read write lock
  to avoid multiple recursive lock acquire operation on
  LOCK_status mutex.  
  On Windows, locking read-write lock recursively is not safe.
  Slim read-write locks, which MySQL uses if they are supported by
  Windows version, do not support recursion according to their
  documentation. For our own implementation of read-write lock,
  which is used in cases when Windows version doesn't support SRW,
  recursive locking of read-write lock can easily lead to deadlock
  if there are concurrent lock requests.
  
  Fix:  
  This patch reverts the previous fix for bug#11765744 that used
  read-write locks. Instead problem of recursive locking for
  LOCK_status mutex is solved by tracking recursion level using
  counter in THD object and acquiring lock only once when we enter
  fill_status() function first time.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4030
committer: Aditya A <aditya.a@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1
timestamp: Mon 2013-07-29 14:45:06 +0530
message:
  Bug#13417564 SKIP SLEEP IN SRV_MASTER_THREAD WHEN
               SHUTDOWN IS IN PROGRESS
  
  PROBLEM
  -------
   In the background thread srv_master_thread() we have a
   a one second delay loop which will continuously monitor
   server activity .If the server is inactive (with out any
   user activity) or in a shutdown state we do some background
   activity like flushing the changes.In the current code
   we are not checking if server is in shutdown state before
   sleeping for one second.
  
  FIX
  ---
  If server is in shutdown state ,then dont go to one second
  sleep.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4029
committer: Annamalai Gurusami <annamalai.gurusami@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1
timestamp: Thu 2013-07-25 14:53:23 +0530
message:
  Bug #17076737 DUPLICATE CONSTRAINTS DISPLAYED WHEN NAME INCLUDES "_IBFK_"
  
  Problem:
  
  When the user specified foreign key name contains "_ibfk_", InnoDB wrongly
  tries to rename it.
  
  Solution:
  
  When a table is renamed, all its associated foreign keys will also be renamed,
  only if the foreign key names are automatically generated.  If the foreign key
  names are given by the user, even if it has _ibfk_ in it, it must not be
  renamed.
  
  rb#2935 approved by Jimmy, Krunal and Satya
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4028
committer: Astha Pareek <astha.pareek@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1-b12535301
timestamp: Tue 2013-07-23 18:13:43 +0530
message:
  BUG#16295518 - SYS_VARS.RPL_INIT_SLAVE_FUNC IS FAILING ON MYSQL-5.1
  BUG#12535301- SYS_VARS.RPL_INIT_SLAVE_FUNC MISMATCHES IN DAILY-5.5
  
  Problem:
  sys_vars.rpl_init_slave_func test was not recorded after
  the last edit. It was disabled on 5.1 after seeing failures
  due to the above reason.
  No old failures as this suite never ran with pb2 on 5.1
  
  Fix:
  Added assert condition after wait for checks.
  Recorded test and enabled it.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4027
committer: Nisha Gopalakrishnan <nisha.gopalakrishnan@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1-5844882
timestamp: Thu 2013-07-18 11:40:08 +0530
message:
  BUG#15844882: MYSQLDUMP FROM 5.5 FAILS WITH AN ERROR WHEN TRYING
                TO DUMP DATA FROM MYSQL-5.6
  
  Analysis
  --------
  Dumping mysql-5.6 data using mysql-5.1/mysql-5.5 'myqldump'
  utility fails with a syntax error.
  
  Server system variable 'sql_quote_show_create' which quotes the
  identifiers is set in the mysqldump utility. The mysldump utility
  of mysql-5.1/mysql-5.5 uses deprecated syntax 'SET OPTION' to set
  the 'sql_quote_show_create' option. The support for the syntax is
  removed in mysql-5.6. Hence syntax error is reported while taking
  the dump.
  
  Fix:
  ---
  Changed the 'mysqldump' code to use the syntax
  'SET SQL_QUOTE_SHOW_CREATE' to set the 'sql_quote_show_create'
  option. That syntax is supported on mysql-5.1, mysql-5.5 and
  mysql-5.6.
  
  NOTE: I have not added an mtr test case since it is difficult
  to simulate the condition. Also the syntax may not be further
  simplified in the future.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4026
committer: sayantan dutta <sayantan.dutta@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1
timestamp: Wed 2013-07-17 14:24:02 +0530
message:
  Bug #17035577 - MTR V1 FAILS TO START SERVER MTR_VERSION=1 PERL MYSQL-TEST-RUN.PL 1ST
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4025
author: murthy.narkedimilli@oracle.com
committer: Murthy Narkedimilli <murthy.narkedimilli@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1
timestamp: Tue 2013-07-09 13:19:53 +0200
message:
  Raise version number after cloning 5.1.71
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 4024
tags: clone-5.1.71-build, mysql-5.1.71
committer: Tor Didriksen <tor.didriksen@oracle.com>
branch nick: 5.1
timestamp: Mon 2013-07-01 15:30:55 +0200
message:
  Bug#58165: "my_empty_string" gets modified and causes LOAD DATA to fail and
  Cleanup test case (left outfile in data dir)